Style fixes for Gemfile and .rubocop.yml
#315
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vinistock
approved these changes
May 14, 2021
paracycle
approved these changes
May 17, 2021
Morriar
approved these changes
May 18, 2021
Signed-off-by: Cory Hutchison <cory.hutchison@shopify.com>
Signed-off-by: Cory Hutchison <cory.hutchison@shopify.com>
mutecipher
force-pushed
the
cleanup-gemfile
branch
from
2153ddb
to
f62da11
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
While doing other work, I noticed that there was some inconsistencies in
Gemfileand.rubocop.ymlthat were irking my OCD.Implementation
Synchronize and use " for string formatting in both files. Also, re-organized the
Gemfileso that similarly scoped gemswere grouped together.
Tests
N/A