Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

project.py - wrong code in get_defined_custom_field_type and get_defined_custom_field_types #159

Open
emesika opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

project.py - wrong code in get_defined_custom_field_type and get_defined_custom_field_types #159

emesika opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@emesika
Copy link
Contributor

emesika commented Nov 3, 2023

Wrong code in get_defined_custom_field_type and get_defined_custom_field_types

  1. get_defined_custom_field_type:

         self._uri, work_item_type_id, key
     should be :
     self.project_id, work_item_type_id, key)

  2. get_defined_custom_field_types:

         self._uri, work_item_type_id
     should be:
     self.project_id, work_item_type_id
emesika added a commit to emesika/pylero that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2023
@emesika
Fixing issue RedHatQE#159
a167374 
Wrong code in get_defined_custom_field_type and get_defined_custom_field_types

get_defined_custom_field_type:

     self._uri, work_item_type_id, key
     should be :
     self.project_id, work_item_type_id, key)

get_defined_custom_field_types:

     self._uri, work_item_type_id
     should be:
     self.project_id, work_item_type_id

Signed-off-by: Eli Mesika <emesika@redhat.com>
leelavg added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2024
@leelavg
Merge pull request #163 from emesika/fix_issue_159
45f5aad 
Fixing issue #159
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@emesika