Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(Rx.using): resourceFactory can return a Future #696

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 11, 2022

Conversation

hoc081098
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@hoc081098 hoc081098 changed the title refactor(using): resourceFactory can returns a Future refactor(using): resourceFactory can return a Future Nov 3, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #696 (871cf6a) into master (c0566b4) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 871cf6a differs from pull request most recent head 7f67cf2. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7f67cf2 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #696      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.68%   93.73%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          76       77       +1     
  Lines        2326     2331       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         2179     2185       +6     
+ Misses        147      146       -1     

@hoc081098 hoc081098 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 3, 2022
@hoc081098 hoc081098 changed the title refactor(using): resourceFactory can return a Future refactor(Rx.using): resourceFactory can return a Future Nov 3, 2022
@hoc081098 hoc081098 merged commit 9464cdd into ReactiveX:master Nov 11, 2022
@hoc081098 hoc081098 deleted the refactor_using branch November 11, 2022 09:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants