Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for Schnorr signatures to be stored in RGB data #16

Closed
1 task
dr-orlovsky opened this issue Sep 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task

Add support for Schnorr signatures to be stored in RGB data #16

dr-orlovsky opened this issue Sep 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
*consensus* Issues affecting distributed concensus
Milestone
v0.6.0

Comments

@dr-orlovsky
Copy link
Member

Requires Schnorr signatures to be merged into secp256k1 main + added wrappers to rust-secp256k1

Issues to track:
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky transferred this issue from LNP-BP/rust-lnpbp Feb 18, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky transferred this issue from another repository Feb 18, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky added this to the v0.5.0 milestone Mar 4, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky modified the milestones: v0.5.0, v0.6.0 Mar 20, 2021
@rajarshimaitra rajarshimaitra mentioned this issue Mar 26, 2021
Closed
@rajarshimaitra
Copy link
Contributor

rajarshimaitra commented Mar 26, 2021 •
edited

Related TODOs:

https://github.com/rgb-org/rgb-core/blob/4e29b8082c0a69cc906fa8d4f604f2980dad17f5/src/contract/data.rs#L112

@dr-orlovsky
Copy link
Member Author

Outdated by the support of arbitrary reach data in v0.7.0

@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky added *consensus* Issues affecting distributed concensus and removed [CONSENSUS-CRITICAL] labels Jan 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
*consensus* Issues affecting distributed concensus
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.6.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dr-orlovsky @rajarshimaitra