Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce Stateful PrecisionPlugin #11638

Merged
merged 20 commits into from Feb 14, 2022

Conversation

jjenniferdai
Copy link
Contributor

@jjenniferdai jjenniferdai commented Jan 27, 2022

What does this PR do?

part of / Fixes #11429: introduce Stateful PrecisionPlugin (see Appendix code changes outlined in issue)

Does your PR introduce any breaking changes? If yes, please list them.

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or internal minor changes/refactorings)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing make sure you have read Review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 馃檭

Copy link
Contributor

@ananthsub ananthsub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as a follow up, please deprecate CheckpointHooks off the PrecisionPlugin interface: https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/blob/86b177ebe5427725b35fde1a8808a7b59b8a277a/pytorch_lightning/plugins/precision/precision_plugin.py#L29

It is no longer needed following the Stateful change and should be removed in v1.8

@ananthsub ananthsub added this to the 1.6 milestone Jan 28, 2022
@ananthsub ananthsub added the checkpointing Related to checkpointing label Jan 28, 2022
Copy link
Member

@Borda Borda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carmocca let's merge this as it is and create an issue bout unifying the stateful mixin?

@mergify mergify bot added the ready PRs ready to be merged label Feb 5, 2022
@carmocca
Copy link
Member

carmocca commented Feb 7, 2022

let's merge this as it is and create an issue bout unifying the stateful mixin?

We can wait for @jjenniferdai to address comments.

@mergify mergify bot added the has conflicts label Feb 9, 2022
@mergify mergify bot removed the has conflicts label Feb 9, 2022
@awaelchli awaelchli mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2022
Copy link
Member

@awaelchli awaelchli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately we never had any tests around amp checkpointing (I couldn't find any?). I created this issue #11885 because we need some form of checks to be confident with refactors like these.

Copy link
Member

@Borda Borda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 merged commit d69b33f into Lightning-AI:master Feb 14, 2022
rohitgr7 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
Co-authored-by: Rohit Gupta <rohitgr1998@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ananthsub <ananth.subramaniam@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
checkpointing Related to checkpointing ready PRs ready to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC] Standardize all stateful components on state_dict/load_state_dict
8 participants