PEP 684 Compatibility #3101
testforvln
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I think we definitely would want to support it as it ties in with the general trend towards removal of global state, e.g. per-module state. But we do have significant design and implementation work to do before we achieve compatibility as we are currently using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi all,
Recently PEP 684 has been accepted, and the per-interpreter gil is aiming for 3.12 which may be released this October. Is there any plan to support this feature in PyO3?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions