Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport maintenance/2.16.x] Minor refactor to util function #8244

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2023

Backport 13fbe68 from #8243.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #8244 (6d78ed2) into maintenance/2.16.x (8b3a10f) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           maintenance/2.16.x    #8244   +/-   ##
===================================================
  Coverage               95.53%   95.53%           
===================================================
  Files                     177      177           
  Lines                   18633    18633           
===================================================
  Hits                    17801    17801           
  Misses                    832      832           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pylint/checkers/utils.py 95.83% <100.00%> (ø)

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added this to the 2.16.2 milestone Feb 8, 2023
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added the Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow label Feb 8, 2023
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit 10f50a0 into maintenance/2.16.x Feb 8, 2023
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas deleted the backport-8243-to-maintenance/2.16.x branch February 8, 2023 21:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants