Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Local and CI/CD isort with different behaviour #1889

Open
matteoettam09 opened this issue Jan 26, 2022 · 24 comments
Open

Local and CI/CD isort with different behaviour #1889

matteoettam09 opened this issue Jan 26, 2022 · 24 comments
Labels
repo_needed Can't currently reproduce, if reproduction steps are added we will resivit this issue.

Comments

@matteoettam09
Copy link

Hello,

have these lines in my .pre-commit.yaml:

- repo: https://github.com/timothycrosley/isort
    rev: 5.9.3 # should be the same as in dev.in
    hooks:
      - id: isort

and locally I have version 5.9.3 of isort. When I run pre-commit run --all-files locally, the isort is passed succesfully, but when the pre-commit is performed in git, there are some differences:

$ pre-commit run --all-files
Check hooks apply to the repository......................................Passed
Check for useless excludes...............................................Passed
Check Yaml...............................................................Passed
Check for merge conflicts................................................Passed
Fix End of Files.........................................................Passed
Trim Trailing Whitespace.................................................Passed
prettier.................................................................Passed
isort....................................................................Failed
- hook id: isort
- files were modified by this hook

Locally I am in a venv, while remotely this is performed inside a docker image:

Running with gitlab-runner 14.6.0 (5316d4ac)
  on gitlab_runner_2 UfyZYyEg
Resolving secrets
00:00
Preparing the "docker" executor
00:03
Using Docker executor with image python:3.9 ...
Pulling docker image python:3.9 ...
Using docker image sha256:f88f0508dc467046a760e8ea0bb5c5861ff4e0ade96226ca4700abd1bd28b696 for python:3.9 with digest python@sha256:bf6f8b201ffac79a1b9fded783e7f0547ad2c2e3e48e96a7a23855c3de14df4b ...

Any idea why this inconsistency?
Thank you.

@danielgafni
Copy link

danielgafni commented Jan 30, 2022

I have the same problem. isort suddenly started failing in my CI (in docker), while running it locally doesn't do anything. isort version is 5.10.1, python 3.8.12.

@anirudnits
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @danielgafni and @matteoettam09, this issue seems relevant to this earlier one: #1790, I don't exactly know if this is applicable here but sharing if this gives any insight. In the meantime, could you provide me the link to the repo so that I could have a look?

@anirudnits anirudnits added the repo_needed Can't currently reproduce, if reproduction steps are added we will resivit this issue. label Jan 30, 2022
@danielgafni
Copy link

I'm sorry, my project is private.

I can only share my observations... the import line that was causing the issue was an import from the "scripts" directory.

The project only had one import from this directory. All the other imports were either from standard/external libraries or from the project package.

I hope this helps...

@matteoettam09
Copy link
Author

Hi @anirudnits, thank you. My project is unfortunately private as well.

In the meantime, I've figured it is possible to run the CI/CD locally, at least with Gitlab, so this could help identify the root cause.

@anirudnits
Copy link
Collaborator

I can only share my observations... the import line that was causing the issue was an import from the "scripts" directory.

Can you provide the exact error? Like is this an issue where in the cicd pipeline the import from scripts directory is being classified as something other than firstparty?

@matteoettam09 Can you run isort with verbose option to identify exactly what the issue is?

~ Aniruddha

@isparks
Copy link

isparks commented Feb 7, 2022

Another private repo here. We have a number of packages pulled directly from gitlab like this in our requirements.txt:

-e git+ssh://git@gitlab.com/OurOrg/library_project.git#egg=library_project

In CI and on one developers machine these are listed as FIRST PARTY. On a second developers machine they are THIRD PARTY as reported by isort. Fixable by using known_first_party in pyproject.toml file.

Both developers using virtual environments, (python 3.8.10) but the FIRST PARTY developer has virtualenv as a sub-directory of the main project. The THIRD PARTY developer has a separate /envs directory for virtualenvs in their home directory.

Don't know if it helps, just another datapoint.

@danielgafni
Copy link

Yes! This happened to me too when I moved my .venv directory into my project dir!

@Magicbeanbuyer
Copy link

Magicbeanbuyer commented Aug 25, 2022

I encounter the same issue.

Screenshot 2022-08-25 at 12 22 16

I run isort via pre-commit both locally in docker container and in CircleCI container, both use the same docker image.

However locally isort behaves like the right side of the diff, and cicd the left side.

 default_language_version:
  python: python3.8

  - repo: https://github.com/pycqa/isort
    rev: 5.10.1
    hooks:
      - id: isort
        name: isort (python)
        language_version: python3.8
      - id: isort
        name: isort (cython)
        language_version: python3.8
        types: [cython]
      - id: isort
        name: isort (pyi)
        language_version: python3.8
        types: [pyi]

Ps. delta is an open source package delta-spark.

Versions:
python 3.8
pre-commit 2.17
isort 5.10.1
local OS: macos

@maggielkx
Copy link

maggielkx commented Aug 30, 2022

same problem encountered as @Magicbeanbuyer, i'm using python 3.8.11 and isrot 5.10.1 (with black profile). could you help here @timothycrosley

@pgarrison
Copy link

I ran into the same issue and was able to reproduce it here.

In my case, the project has the following structure:

.
├── app
│   ├── pyproject.toml
│   └── util
│       └── constants.py
├── main.py

pyproject.toml is:

[tool.isort]
force_sort_within_sections = true

If I move pyproject.toml to the top level of the project structure, I am unable to reproduce the error. See the linked repository for a detailed log

@kashiwachen
Copy link

I got something similar. isort behaves differently at local with isort --check--profile black .. In addition, it behaves differently at project root and project sub-directory.
Here is my project structure:

.
├── Dockerfile
├── README.md
├── airflow
│   ├── airflow.cfg
│   ├── dags
│   │   ├── data_dag.py

If I run isort --check --profile black ./ at root. It returns:

> Skipped 1 files

If I run isort --check --profile black ./ at dags folder. It returns:

> ERROR: ./airflow/dags/data_dag.py Imports are incorrectly sorted and/or formatted.

And the changes from isort --check --diff --profile black ./:

 from datetime import datetime, timedelta

 import pendulum
-from utils.bash_util import gen_bash_command
-from utils.convert_util import A2B
-from utils.path_util import gen_path
-
 from airflow import models
 from airflow.operators.bash import BashOperator
 from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator
 from airflow.providers.amazon.aws.hooks.s3 import S3Hook
+
+from utils.bash_util import gen_bash_command
+from utils.convert_util import A2B
+from utils.path_util import gen_path

kaxil added a commit to astronomer/astro-sdk that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2022
This is duplicated with arguments in .pre-commit-config.yaml because isort is
having some issues picking up these config files. isort issue: PyCQA/isort#1889
kaxil added a commit to astronomer/astro-sdk that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2022
isort issue: PyCQA/isort#1889

Because of that issue we have our isort config duplicated with arguments
in `.pre-commit-config.yaml` and `.isort.cfg`.

This was identified in #1037
and is a follow-up to #1030
@rafrafek
Copy link
Contributor

rafrafek commented Nov 7, 2022

default_language_version does not work because isort hook specifies language version.

See comment: pre-commit/pre-commit#2586 (comment)

@pgarrison
Copy link

@rafrafek do you mean that you expect your PR #1987 to fix this issue?

@rafrafek
Copy link
Contributor

rafrafek commented Nov 8, 2022

No, sorry for the confusion. I just found this issue by searching for default_language_version. I should create a new issue.

@Gornoka
Copy link

Gornoka commented Nov 10, 2022

For me the issue manifested when installing a first party module from a git submodule, it was detected as Firstparty on my system (Windows11 python3.10) and some of the imports were incorrectly detected as Thirdparty on the ci system (Ubuntu20.04 python3.10) with all else being equal.

isort vvv outputs

local

from-type place_module for my_package returned FIRSTPARTY
from-type place_module for my_package.something returned FIRSTPARTY

ci

from-type place_module for my_package returned FIRSTPARTY
from-type place_module for my_package.something returned THIRDPARTY

As workaround I have added the following to my isort config.

[settings]
known_first_party=my_package,my_package.something

@pgarrison
Copy link

@anirudnits can we get the tags on this issue updated? I posted a MWE above, here's the link again

@TheBeege
Copy link

This is affecting us, too. Has anyone isolated the issue?

@stinos
Copy link

stinos commented Dec 21, 2022

Not sure if related, but I'm seeing things like

else-type place_module for foo returned FIRSTPARTY
else-type place_module for foo.scan returned THIRDPARTY

I do have more than one foo directory if that matters, but only one is in the Python module search path, and that's the one which also has the scan subdirectory.

Now, I'm a first-time isort user so accompanying question: can I just 'merge' sections and tell isort to treat future/stdlib as one section, and have everything else go in another section? I don't really care about whether something is 'third' of 'first' anyway.

@Gornoka
Copy link

Gornoka commented Dec 21, 2022

Not sure if related, but I'm seeing things like

else-type place_module for foo returned FIRSTPARTY
else-type place_module for foo.scan returned THIRDPARTY

I do have more than one foo directory if that matters, but only one is in the Python module search path, and that's the one which also has the scan subdirectory.

Now, I'm a first-time isort user so accompanying question: can I just 'merge' sections and tell isort to treat future/stdlib as one section, and have everything else go in another section? I don't really care about whether something is 'third' of 'first' anyway.

you could try my workaround.

As workaround I have added the following to my isort config.

[settings]
known_first_party=my_package,my_package.something

@stinos
Copy link

stinos commented Dec 22, 2022

@Gornoka yes I'm aware, but I'd really rather not start manually listing modules, that's not really manageable.

@jheddings
Copy link

I've seen the same behavior in this job. Locally, isort separates the 3rd party groups, however the workflow groups them together.

In my case, my working copy was in folder named github, which is the same name as an external module. Assumedly, this caused the external module to appear as local, which was obviously different in CI. Once I changed the local folder name to something else (ansible-github), the CI action and my local action resulted in the same behavior.

So, in case others run into a similar issue, if your imports match the name of the current folder, you may have unexpected sorting results.

@fjoanr
Copy link

fjoanr commented Mar 13, 2023

I've seen the same behavior in this job. Locally, isort separates the 3rd party groups, however the workflow groups them together.

In my case, my working copy was in folder named github, which is the same name as an external module. Assumedly, this caused the external module to appear as local, which was obviously different in CI. Once I changed the local folder name to something else (ansible-github), the CI action and my local action resulted in the same behavior.

So, in case others run into a similar issue, if your imports match the name of the current folder, you may have unexpected sorting results.

I had the same issue, where isort would not change my files in local but then fail in the CI/CD job. Tested a lot of stuff, ensuring versions are the same, and even updated my Docker image for the runner.

Turns out, we have a folder named "NLTK" within the repo, and the error was happening because import nltk would be moved around wrongly. The solution for me was to add :

known_third_party=nltk

to the .isort.cfg, and that did the trick. I guess another solution for us would be to rename NLTK to nltk_utils instead. But it is working now, so thanks for this thread!

@ed-randall-blk
Copy link

ed-randall-blk commented Aug 15, 2023

This same approach solved for me too.
We had the following import, the local pre-commit hook vs CI/CD pipeline were fighting over its placement:
from minio import Minio
I happened to have a subdir minio created during development to store a local minio db. isort apparently considered that the name matched an import therefore it must be a first-party python package dir. The pipeline on the other hand didn't have the minio subdir.
Renaming it to minio-db fixed the issue.

@fiendish
Copy link

fiendish commented Jan 19, 2024

Problem occurs for me because the pyproject.toml was located at a higher directory level than what I'm trying to isort, so it creates a found-local-dir vs installed-package conflict (because isort treats those differently). My solution was moving the pyproject.toml to be next to the package I'm trying to sort imports in instead of up a directory.

Why that only happens in my CI environment and not locally, I don't readily know, but here we are.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
repo_needed Can't currently reproduce, if reproduction steps are added we will resivit this issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests