Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include automation after customer changes Requires Recrawl Settings #1222

Open
danielabloch opened this issue Nov 30, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@danielabloch
Copy link

danielabloch commented Nov 30, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem?

When a WP customer makes changes to their plugin settings (under Requires Recrawl Settings), they have to message Parse.ly support to let them know of the change, so that they recrawl the site.

Describe the solution you'd like

change-settings-email

Ideas to consider:

  • If someone makes changes here, automatically send an email to support and cc the VIP user, so the request to reprocess the data doesn’t rely on the customer,
  • If someone makes changes here, automatically initiate a recrawl on behalf of the customer.
@acicovic
Copy link
Collaborator

@arhine, @thompsonjoshua, do you think it would it make Parse.ly support a service to send an automated "Recrawl settings updated" email, citing the domain name that has been updated? We would send the email and notify the user that Parse.ly support has been notified of the event.

@thompsonjoshua
Copy link

I like the idea of streamlining the process but I'm also thinking of some edge cases that could happen:

  • a customer modifying their settings in the first few days of integration won't need a recrawl
  • a customer that makes multiple changes and saves in a row would generate multiple emails that would Round Robin to different support members
  • the recrawl process isn't ready for automation:
    • we run recrawls on posts and non-posts separately
    • we try to limit ourselves to recrawling <100k posts at a time to minimize timeout errors.

If a customer does want a recrawl, they might actually want a rebuild too. If we do a recrawl without a rebuild, they might not understand the results, i.e., split posts from different eras of metadata. Also, customers oftentimes don't have any concept of the labor or machine costs of recrawls and rebuilds (and why should they?) so they might go about requesting several in a row.

My preference is to de-prioritize this item in favor of other plugin pursuits.

@acicovic
Copy link
Collaborator

@thompsonjoshua, thank you for your input!

@acicovic
Copy link
Collaborator

Given the feedback, I'm suggesting to close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants