Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

4.0 | Revise exit codes for PHPCS and PHPCBF commands #184

Open
jrfnl opened this issue Dec 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

4.0 | Revise exit codes for PHPCS and PHPCBF commands #184

jrfnl opened this issue Dec 25, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@jrfnl
Copy link
Member

jrfnl commented Dec 25, 2023

Repost from squizlabs/PHP_CodeSniffer#2898 by @gsherwood:

Version 4 is a good time to review the exit codes that both scripts produce to ensure that success cases all use 0 and that all failure cases have codes that make sense. Documentation in the wiki to describe the new exist codes should be an output of this work.


Additional info posted by @jrfnl:

Loosely related open issues:

And some related closed issues:

And the following open PR is also related:


Related remark posted by @nelson6e65:

Param --runtime-set ignore_warnings_on_exit 1 works on phpcs, but it does not for phpcbf.


Question by @dfelton:

Is there any documentation somewhere that lists all non 0 or 1 exit codes that exist, and the meaning of them?

Today was the first time I discovered an exit code of 3 is used for when and invalid standard is given. It'd be nice to be able to read a compiled list of what exit codes there are, and I cannot seem to find any information on the wiki on this topic.

Reply by @jrfnl:

I think this is what you are looking for: squizlabs/PHP_CodeSniffer#930 (comment)

@greg0ire
Copy link

greg0ire commented Jan 5, 2024

0: no errors found
1: errors found
2: fixable errors found
3: processing error

It does not look like all situations are mutually exclusive. For instance, it's possible to have fixable and unfixable errors found during the same run. This should IMO be encoded as 1+2=3. If a processing error happens, 4 should be added, and each new situation should be associated with a power of 2, so that it's possible to tell more about what happened from the exit code alone.

@jrfnl
Copy link
Member Author

jrfnl commented Jan 5, 2024

@greg0ire I'm sure Greg had some idea in mind on where he wanted to go with this when he created the issue, but the above is all the info which is available.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants