Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

top-level "epsg" property in STAC Item #260

Open
bossie opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

top-level "epsg" property in STAC Item #260

bossie opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@bossie
Copy link
Collaborator

bossie commented Feb 9, 2024

A batch job results item has a top-level "epsg" property:

{
  "assets": {
    "openEO.tif": {
      "eo:bands": [
        {
          "center_wavelength": 0.6646,
          "name": "B04"
        },
        {
          "center_wavelength": 0.8328,
          "name": "B08"
        }
      ],
      "file:nodata": [
        "nan"
      ],
      "file:size": 696369,
      "href": "https://openeo-dev.vito.be/openeo/1.1/jobs/j-24020792a110457fa713a8a3a702e70c/results/assets/.../openEO.tif?expires=1708080177",
      "proj:bbox": [
        553630,
        5618240,
        702380,
        5648760
      ],
      "proj:epsg": 32631,
      "proj:shape": [
        14875,
        3052
      ],
      "raster:bands": [
        {
          "name": "B04",
          "statistics": {
            "maximum": 5324,
            "mean": 512.68561347599,
            "minimum": 1,
            "stddev": 331.19358871402,
            "valid_percent": 0.04838
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "B08",
          "statistics": {
            "maximum": 6397,
            "mean": 3032.8594091406,
            "minimum": 335,
            "stddev": 1164.6197215889,
            "valid_percent": 0.04839
          }
        }
      ],
      "roles": [
        "data"
      ],
      "title": "openEO.tif",
      "type": "image/tiff; application=geotiff"
    }
  },
  "bbox": null,
  "collection": "j-24020792a110457fa713a8a3a702e70c",
  "epsg": 32631,
  "geometry": null,
  "id": "openEO.tif",
  "links": [
    {
      "href": "https://openeo-dev.vito.be/openeo/1.1/jobs/j-24020792a110457fa713a8a3a702e70c/results/items/openEO.tif",
      "rel": "self",
      "type": "application/geo+json"
    },
    {
      "href": "https://openeo-dev.vito.be/openeo/1.1/jobs/j-24020792a110457fa713a8a3a702e70c/results",
      "rel": "collection",
      "type": "application/json"
    }
  ],
  "properties": {
    "datetime": null,
    "end_datetime": "2022-02-01T00:00:00Z",
    "proj:bbox": [
      553630,
      5618240,
      702380,
      5648760
    ],
    "proj:shape": [
      14875,
      3052
    ],
    "start_datetime": "2022-01-01T00:00:00Z"
  },
  "stac_extensions": [
    "https://stac-extensions.github.io/eo/v1.1.0/schema.json",
    "https://stac-extensions.github.io/file/v2.1.0/schema.json"
  ],
  "stac_version": "0.9.0",
  "type": "Feature"
}

I would expect "properties"/"proj:epsg" instead but I'm not sure if this is maybe according to an older version of STAC.

@JohanKJSchreurs?

@bossie bossie added the question label Feb 9, 2024
@JohanKJSchreurs
Copy link
Contributor

In the current version of the Projection STAC extension, it should indeed be "properties"/"proj:epsg"

Re: older standards: my first impression is that epsg at the top level was never really part of the STAC spec or the Projection extension.

I had a look at the STAC spec v0.0.9, v0.0.8 and the previous version of the Projection extension (v1.0.0) but as far as I can tell they also expect "properties"/"proj:epsg" (going by the examples they provide).

To fully confirm it I would have to dig deeper. But another indication is that a few bits of the stacspec changelog indicate that in older versions they were using eo:epsg rather than epsg at the top level. Some changelog messages say they moved from using eo:epsg in an older standard, to proj:epsg.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants