Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explore using METplus to verify regional models against the ECMWF analyses #271

Closed
mollybsmith-noaa opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
task Tasks break a project down into discrete steps

Comments

@mollybsmith-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator

The regional group has expressed interest in verifying their RRFS retros against ECMWF analyses. One problem will be our lack of an archive of those grids.

@mollybsmith-noaa mollybsmith-noaa added the task Tasks break a project down into discrete steps label Dec 11, 2023
@mollybsmith-noaa mollybsmith-noaa self-assigned this Dec 11, 2023
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity.

@mollybsmith-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is done, but testing is blocked until the HRRR and RRFS_A are available on Hera.

@mollybsmith-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The HRRR is now available, and we are successfully verifying it in real time! Just still blocked where RRFS_A is concerned.

@mollybsmith-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The RRFS_A was briefly available on Hera, and I was able to confirm that our workflow works. Then globus went down, and we stopped getting data, but this issue is still completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
task Tasks break a project down into discrete steps
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant