Add support for multiple JWK Sets #78
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Code wise LGTM! I will have time to test this implementation on earliest on Thursday though. Thank you for the fast implementation, I didn't find the time yet to contribute the PR. 😞 |
# Conflicts: # README.md # options.go
|
I'll keep this PR open until Thursday night EST. Please let me know if any changes would be good or if it's fine as-is, @aklinkert. I'd like to hear your opinion. Anyone else is free to comment as well. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The purpose of this pull request is to add support for multiple JWK Sets. This allows
keyfuncto pull remote JWKS resources from multiple URLs and provide onejwt.Keyfuncto from them.This pull request is intended to resolve #72.