Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add general constraint handling that can be the basis of depends/conflicts/either #131

Open
Fryguy opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #156
Open

Add general constraint handling that can be the basis of depends/conflicts/either #131

Fryguy opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #156
Labels
enhancement help wanted

Comments

@Fryguy
Copy link
Member

Fryguy commented Apr 19, 2022

From #130 (comment), @nanobowers wrote:

This seems like a specialization of a more general type of argument validation.

More specifically, the condition you are trying to satisfy with either: is max==1 and min==1. Should we entertain cases where min/max are not 1? conflicts: is kinda like max==1 and min==ANY

Was thinking something along the lines of:

validate min: <Integer/nil>, max: <Integer/nil>, args: <Array of Symbol>
@nanobowers
Copy link
Collaborator

@Fryguy taking a look at this.

nanobowers added a commit to nanobowers/optimist that referenced this issue May 12, 2024
@nanobowers
adding MinMaxConstraint and validate for ManageIQ#131
e9d30c7
@nanobowers nanobowers linked a pull request May 12, 2024 that will close this issue
Draft
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement help wanted
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Refactor constraints nanobowers/optimist
2 participants
@Fryguy @nanobowers