New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: added torch.all #355
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @k223kim! I made a couple suggestions for logical_not
, nothing major. If we could separate that into its own PR that'd be great. Then we can get that merged and return to looking at all
!
Oh wow, thanks so much @mruberry for taking a look at this draft PR. I will submit a separate PR for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks really good, @k223kim. I made a few comments for your review
Hey @mruberry! Hope you had a great weekend. Made some updates based on your comments. Would be amazing if you can take a look! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Before submitting
What does this PR do?
Fixes #336. I have added
logical_not
to implementtorch.all
.PR review
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.
Did you have fun?
⚡️