Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update L.Util.formatNum rounding #6587

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 14, 2019
Merged

Update L.Util.formatNum rounding #6587

merged 2 commits into from Apr 14, 2019

Conversation

inkstak
Copy link
Contributor

@inkstak inkstak commented Apr 1, 2019

Fix #6586

@inkstak
Copy link
Contributor Author

inkstak commented Apr 1, 2019

Also, I've updated documentation about toGeoJSON, and its precision argument.

@inkstak
Copy link
Contributor Author

inkstak commented Apr 8, 2019

Hi, the build successfully passed on Travis, but the status doesn't show up in Github.
Is there any problem on my side ?

https://travis-ci.org/Leaflet/Leaflet/builds/514359440

@IvanSanchez
Copy link
Member

Apparently https://travis-ci.org/Leaflet/Leaflet/builds/514359440 passed, so I see no problem there.

@IvanSanchez
Copy link
Member

Changes to the documentation are not really needed, because #6375 is already merged.

@IvanSanchez IvanSanchez merged commit cd096d7 into Leaflet:master Apr 14, 2019
@inkstak
Copy link
Contributor Author

inkstak commented Apr 15, 2019

Thanks

cherniavskii added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2019
IvanSanchez pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2019
* Revert "Update L.Util.formatNum rounding (#6587)"

This reverts commit cd096d7.

* revert docs changes
Schleuse pushed a commit to Schleuse/Leaflet that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
* Update L.Util.formatNum rounding

* Update doc: add precision argument to toGeoJSON()
Schleuse pushed a commit to Schleuse/Leaflet that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
* Revert "Update L.Util.formatNum rounding (Leaflet#6587)"

This reverts commit cd096d7.

* revert docs changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

L.Util.formatNum round
2 participants