xml2rfc test regression with 57.0 #1752
Comments
|
Hi! It’s probably a duplicate of fixed #1748. Could you please check that it’s fixed in |
|
Yes. Works now. Thanks. |
|
We’ll release version 57.1 soon. |
|
Excellent news. Thanks. |
kesara
added a commit
to kesara/xml2rfc
that referenced
this issue
Nov 4, 2022
Weasyprint 57.0 introduced a bug that breaks xml2rfc tests. This is fixed in Weasyprint 57.1. See Kozea/WeasyPrint#1752
kesara
added a commit
to ietf-tools/xml2rfc
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2022
Weasyprint 57.0 introduced a bug that breaks xml2rfc tests. This is fixed in Weasyprint 57.1. See Kozea/WeasyPrint#1752
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Since I upgraded to 57.0, xml2rfc fails its tests. Here's a log (although I don't expect it to help much):
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/x/xml2rfc/27394437/log.gz
It's not clear to me if this is due to an issue in Weasyprint or an error in xml2rfc. I bisected the issue on the Weasyprint side to this commit:
4b447d3
If I add the deleted line of code back in, all the tests pass. I verified that when the tests are running, font is weasyprint.pdf.stream.Font and last_font is None in some cases and both are weasyprint.pdf.stream.Font in others and the conditional for stream.set_font_size is executed, so I'm somewhat mystified how it could go wrong. Any suggestions would be appreciated?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: