Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Old reactive-streams version in kotlinx-coroutines-reactive #2740

Closed
varche opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Old reactive-streams version in kotlinx-coroutines-reactive #2740

varche opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@varche
Copy link

varche commented Jun 2, 2021

I am not able to use Publisher.asFlow() in my project because I have 1.0.3 version while kotlinx-coroutines-reactive has 1.0.2

@qwwdfsad qwwdfsad added question docs KDoc and API reference labels Jun 2, 2021
@qwwdfsad
Copy link
Member

qwwdfsad commented Jun 2, 2021

This is expected, but not yet enforced (#2494) behaviour.
Please ensure that all the supplementary modules have the same version as kotlinx-coroutines-core, meanwhile we'll try to provide a better documentation regarding this behaviour

@varche
Copy link
Author

varche commented Jun 2, 2021

Looks like I don't have problem with modules versions, my issue is that kotlinx-coroutines-reactive uses reactive_streams_version=1.0.2 (see https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.coroutines/blob/master/gradle.properties) but I use newer version (1.0.3)

@qwwdfsad qwwdfsad added enhancement and removed docs KDoc and API reference question labels Jun 4, 2021
qwwdfsad added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2021
woainikk pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2021
woainikk pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 12, 2021
woainikk pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 12, 2021
pablobaxter pushed a commit to pablobaxter/kotlinx.coroutines that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants