Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Partial coverage accessing KProperty via reflection #150

Closed
pacdouglas opened this issue Mar 7, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Partial coverage accessing KProperty via reflection #150

pacdouglas opened this issue Mar 7, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
Bug Bug issue type Kover Coverage Tool

Comments

@pacdouglas
Copy link

pacdouglas commented Mar 7, 2022 •
edited

Hi!

I got some weird case, when using reflection kotlin API and running the coverage using JACOCO, we have no problems, but using the INTELLIJ, we have some 'yellow' indications.

Jacoco Report:
image

Intellij Report:
image

image

image

I believe it can be a problem when use reflection on parameters, so I tried isolate the problem on this repository
kover-error-example
@shanshin
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the report!

@shanshin
Copy link
Collaborator

Duplicates #148

@shanshin shanshin assigned shanshin and unassigned shanshin Mar 24, 2022
@pacdouglas pacdouglas changed the title False negative using reflection on parameters Partial coverage accessing KProperty via reflection Jul 18, 2022
@shanshin
Copy link
Collaborator

Closed as a duplicate of #148

@shanshin shanshin closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bug Bug issue type Kover Coverage Tool
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pacdouglas @shanshin