You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some creators/users have expressed a curiosity/desire that revenue splits should be an event that is triggered by the system somehow. The rationale for this seems fairly obvious to basically ensure that a channel does actually activate a revenue split at some point in the future, even though the channel owner cannot claim their own revenue until a revenue split is active there is still some mistrust that a channel owner may be lazy. This seems like a fair argument in favor of allowing this.
Solution
I think due to scaling issues this is a very difficult one to tackle--even with some kind of punishment for the channel owner it still does not guarantee they would actually activate a channel split and there is probably some world in which lost accounts could cause issues. I can't envision how it would occur with runtime changes and still allow for the system to scale to significant levels.
Perhaps it is possible for the curator group to be given permission to do this somehow, but this does open doors to abuse due to it freezing market activity.
One other possible solution is to utilize the recently implemented proxy pallet within Atlas/CRT design flow and allow for a "trusted external party" to trigger a revenue split action on behalf of a channel owner. However, this does not ensure at a system level that this even would actually occur.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Simplest sollution is to allow anyone to trigger splits when channel balance goes above a certain amount. I don't know if I think this is a good idea though, best to at least wait until some real number of people feel a creator is not behaving prosocially.
Simplest sollution is to allow anyone to trigger splits when channel balance goes above a certain amount. I don't know if I think this is a good idea though, best to at least wait until some real number of people feel a creator is not behaving prosocially.
That sounds like a very common sense solution, I wish I had thought of that! And agreed it is best to wait a while to see how things materialize with the feature first.
I suppose another potential solution may be for the $CRT holders to be able to stake their tokens to trigger a revenue split--and if n% of the CRT are staked then the revenue split is forced to begin.
Problem
Some creators/users have expressed a curiosity/desire that revenue splits should be an event that is triggered by the system somehow. The rationale for this seems fairly obvious to basically ensure that a channel does actually activate a revenue split at some point in the future, even though the channel owner cannot claim their own revenue until a revenue split is active there is still some mistrust that a channel owner may be lazy. This seems like a fair argument in favor of allowing this.
Solution
proxy
pallet within Atlas/CRT design flow and allow for a "trusted external party" to trigger a revenue split action on behalf of a channel owner. However, this does notensure
at a system level that this even would actually occur.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: