fix: Handle unhandled promise rejections in bin #255
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When using Node 12/14 + allowlisting using the old advisory format, the unexpectedly pipeline passes because Node 12/14 does not throw an error with unhandled promise rejections. Now, instead, we handle promise rejections at the root and explicitly process.exit(1).
andy-patt
approved these changes
May 16, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When using Node 12/14 + allowlisting using the old advisory format, the pipeline unexpectedly passes because Node 12/14 does not throw an error with unhandled promise rejections.
Now, instead, we handle promise rejections at the root and explicitly
process.exit(1).I found this out by looking at a community project:
https://github.com/brave-intl/publishers/runs/6428625498?check_suite_focus=true
This is the before-and-after of the change:
I am considering releasing this with a patch version bump.