Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Sphinx features like rst_prolog #10

Open
ITler opened this issue Aug 14, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Support Sphinx features like rst_prolog #10

ITler opened this issue Aug 14, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@ITler
Copy link

ITler commented Aug 14, 2020

Sorry for filling up your issues list. I am not an experienced python coder, so I am kind of wondering, what is possible for m2r2 in regards of supporting Sphinx provided features.

I would like to see for instance the rst_prolog feature to work, because it would help a lot with DRY documentation.

If it is not possible to provide that support or you are not planning so, it is okay. I just would like to get a clear understanding if I can count on m2r2 and build my use-case around it, or whether I should look for another approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant