New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow supressing debugCookies() #110
Comments
Adding |
lolli42
added a commit
to lolli42/module-webdriver
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2022
Similar to WebDriver->setCookie(), methods seeCookie(), dontSeeCookie(), resetCookie() and loadSessionSnapshot() have an additional optional argument to suppress debug output of cookie operations. Closes: Codeception#110
Cool thing. Happy thanks! |
lolli42
added a commit
to TYPO3/testing-framework
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2022
Not debugging reset cookies reduces noise running acceptance tests. This has been added with codeception 3.2.0. Codeception/module-webdriver#111 Codeception/module-webdriver#110
lolli42
added a commit
to TYPO3/testing-framework
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2022
Not debugging reset cookies reduces noise running acceptance tests. This has been added with codeception/module-webdriver 3.2.0. Codeception/module-webdriver#111 Codeception/module-webdriver#110
lolli42
added a commit
to TYPO3/testing-framework
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2022
Not debugging reset cookies reduces noise running acceptance tests. This has been added with codeception/module-webdriver 3.2.0. Codeception/module-webdriver#111 Codeception/module-webdriver#110
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Method
WebDriver->setCookie()
has an argument to suppressdebugCookies()
.Methods
seeCookie()
,dontSeeCookie()
,resetCookie()
andloadSessionSnapshot()
don't provide this.We're using a helper to set cookies for quick access of our login restricted things and the cookie output is kinda noisy, which we'd like to suppress.
I could come up with a quite simple PR to add this. Do you think this would find general acceptance?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: