Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use regular dropdown to check materials cloud sub-databases #433

Open
unkcpz opened this issue Jun 2, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Use regular dropdown to check materials cloud sub-databases #433

unkcpz opened this issue Jun 2, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@unkcpz
Copy link
Collaborator

unkcpz commented Jun 2, 2022

The DropdownExtended is used to support the category of projects databases of materials cloud. It makes no too much sense which one should be General and which should be in Projects. Moreover, this widget cause issue such as #369. Can we remove it and use regular dropdown widget, put all sub-databases parallelly?

What do you think? @CasperWA @csadorf

@csadorf
Copy link
Collaborator

csadorf commented Jun 2, 2022

This was specifically requested by Nicola. Maybe we can use a regular widget for now, but try to bring it back eventually?

@unkcpz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

unkcpz commented Jun 2, 2022

But what is 'general' mean, why only CURATED covalent organic frameworks database?

@csadorf
Copy link
Collaborator

csadorf commented Jun 2, 2022

But what is 'general' mean, why only CURATED covalent organic frameworks database?

I would suggest you bring this up directly with him.

@unkcpz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

unkcpz commented Jun 3, 2022

Okay, I will keep this issue open and put zero effort into this before the testing with Nicola.

@CasperWA
Copy link
Owner

CasperWA commented Jun 7, 2022

While this is a MaterialsCloud-specific question you have raised, I will keep it here (not moving it to tools-optimade-client, where it otherwise belongs), due to the fact that the DropdownExtended widget is indeed implemented here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants