Skip to content

795 calburnmicro resolving performance #801

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 11, 2022

Conversation

vb2ae
Copy link
Member

@vb2ae vb2ae commented Apr 24, 2022

Save some typeinfo in variables to prevent having to get it all the time

@vb2ae vb2ae linked an issue Apr 24, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@vb2ae vb2ae requested a review from KasperSK April 30, 2022 15:45
@KasperSK
Copy link
Member

KasperSK commented May 9, 2022

Looks like a small change, can we benchmark to verify that this will be faster?

@vb2ae
Copy link
Member Author

vb2ae commented May 10, 2022

Sure I will try and do that tonight

@vb2ae
Copy link
Member Author

vb2ae commented May 11, 2022

Before change

image

After

image

@vb2ae
Copy link
Member Author

vb2ae commented May 11, 2022

Changed key == null to string.isnullorempty(key)

image

@KasperSK
Copy link
Member

Good find and nice job with the benchmarking. I think we should merge this. Do you have any more changes or should I go ahead and merge?

@vb2ae
Copy link
Member Author

vb2ae commented May 11, 2022

That is the last change for this issue. You can merge it. Do you have any PRs for me to review and merge?

@vb2ae vb2ae merged commit 872033b into master May 11, 2022
@vb2ae vb2ae deleted the 795-calburnmicro-resolving-performance branch July 3, 2022 20:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Calburn.Micro resolving performance
2 participants