blob.go: more idiomatic and clearer 'for' loop #24
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
lgtm. will merge once CLA is approved. |
|
thanks, @ahmetalpbalkan . Will this depend on some sort of internal process within Microsoft? On my end, I've signed it already. |
|
@jf I'm not sure, I haven't gone through that. @jeffmendoza may answer that. |
ahmetb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2015
blob.go: more idiomatic and clearer 'for' loop
AutorestCI
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2019
Merge pull request #24 from leonardbf/NFSAAS-2185-R4-swagger-standard NFSAAS-2185 update to R4 RP standard
AutorestCI
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2019
Merge pull request #24 from leonardbf/NFSAAS-2185-R4-swagger-standard NFSAAS-2185 update to R4 RP standard
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This one has been bugging me for a while now... so while we're waiting for #19, I might as well get this in (or is this dependent upon the CLA as well?)