Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

orchestration: query chains that do not have async-icq enabled #9326

Open
0xpatrickdev opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

orchestration: query chains that do not have async-icq enabled #9326

0xpatrickdev opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@0xpatrickdev
Copy link
Member

0xpatrickdev commented May 6, 2024

What is the Problem Being Solved?

As a developer using the Orchestration API, I want to be able to query state on remote chains that do not have the async-icq module enabled. #9198 gives me support for revisions like osmosis:v21.0.0, but does not work for others like gaia:v14.0.0.

Description of the Design

Another implementation of Interchain Queries is by the use of the KV store which can be seen implemented here by QuickSilver.
The implementation works even if the host side hasn't implemented ICQ, however, it does not fully leverage the IBC standards.
- cosmos/ibc-apps/modules/async-icq README

Spec: https://github.com/quicksilver-zone/quicksilver/blob/bf6c1bb8251b15f785c19fb0bdd0c155512d9161/x/interchainquery/spec/README.md

Protos: https://github.com/quicksilver-zone/quicksilver/tree/main/proto/quicksilver/interchainquery/v1

Security Considerations

Scaling Considerations

Test Plan

Upgrade Considerations

@0xpatrickdev 0xpatrickdev changed the title Add support for additional ibc application querying protocols orchestration: query chains that do not have async-icq enabled May 13, 2024
@0xpatrickdev 0xpatrickdev added enhancement New feature or request and removed needs-design labels May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant