-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support multiple users at the same time. #12
Comments
Hey there, thanks for the input. Well, I'm not planning for multi-user support but that doesn't mean you can't build that feature in yourself. Would you be interested in trying to move forward with adding that feature? If so, I could give you some pointers to get going |
+1 |
+1... https://github.com/gai00/docker-cloud9/ I posted a question to the developer asking how he/she could run Cloud9 with the current setting that opens random port numbers: Docker will add support to port range through -expose soon... Would this be:
3.1 Log the user to Cloud9Hub I've been pursuing this approach after learning about "Runnable.com", as they did a fantastic job with Docker... They solved the problem port by running the applications ALWAYS on port 80. Thanks and I'm waiting for this! Marcello |
That would be great! Can you please describe the plans for extending it to allow multiple instances of cloud9...? |
That's relatively easy - the tricky bit will be to get private workspaces working. I will be using etcd+confd+HAProxy to proxy the containers to the public facing network. Multiple instance work like this:
The branch I am working on is here: https://github.com/AVGP/cloud9hub/tree/docker |
👍 Awesome! I have experimented etcd for distributed builds, but never used confd... The plan sounds great and I'm glad you shared those insights... 2.b: Not only the volume, but can you can also take the workspace's desired port number? Apps that don't follow 12Factor are built with their port numbers statically... thanks @AVGP |
Hm, multiple ports are a problem. I could not see how that could work, I'm afraid. However, single-port is not a problem, particularly because the port is always the same on the containers |
+1 for multiple users, each one having their own workspace, logged in at the same time on the same port. |
Thanks for your great job first!
Is it possible to support multiple users at the same time?
What about terminal console?
How to separate different users' terminal console?
Regards
Simon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: